The integrated test: a major new advance in Down's syndrome screening

The integrated test is a new method of screening for Down's syndrome, which uses measurements obtained during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy to provide a single estimate of the risk of having a pregnancy with Down's syndrome.

The integrated test is safer and more effective than currently used tests, because high detection rates can be achieved with much lower false-positive rates than existing tests, as illustrated below.

For example, using the integrated test in place of the triple test, the detection rate is higher (86% compared with 77%), and the false-positive rate is much lower (1% compared with 5%).

 

 

The screening performance of each test was based on results in the SURUSS study and Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, Rudnicka AR (2004). SURUSS in perspective. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111, 521-531

 

Triple test Maternal age with AFP, uE3 and total hCG in the second trimester
Quadruple test Maternal age with AFP, uE3, total hCG and inhibin-A in the second trimester
Combined test Maternal age with nuchal translucency, PAPP-A and hCG in the first trimester
Integrated test Maternal age with nuchal translucency and PAPP-A in the first trimester, and AFP, uE3, total hCG and inhibin-A in the second trimester
Serum Integrated test Maternal age with PAPP-A in the first trimester, and AFP, uE3, total hCG and inhibin-A in the second trimester
 

For more information on the integrated test, see: Wald NJ, Watt HC, Hackshaw AK (1999) Integrated screening for Down's syndrome based on tests performed during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med 341, 461-467

alpha version 7.0 is the first screening software to interpret integrated test screening results. If you are interested in using alpha with the integrated test, please contact us.

First trimester screening - the 'combined' test

Combining the ultrasound marker nuchal translucency with biochemical markers has been shown to be an effective method of screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester of pregnancy (10-13 weeks) with an expected detection rate of 85% at a false-positive rate of 5%. (Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK. (1997) Combining ultrasound and biochemistry in first-trimester screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 17, 821-829)

With alpha, you can interpret first trimester screening results as well as second trimester, using one software. You can also use alpha to interpret the integrated test, in which first and second trimester

 

Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS)

alpha version 7.0 can identify pregnancies at high risk of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) among women who screen positive for Down's syndrome or Edward's syndrome (trisomy 18). An additional diagnostic test (measurement of 7-DHC in amniotic fluid) can then be offered to these women. This approach can detect 50-60% of SLOS pregnancies, without increasing the number of diagnostic tests performed.

Advances in second trimester screening

In vitro fertilization Second trimester total hCG and free beta hCG levels are raised in women who have become pregnant through in vitro fertilization(IVF) and uE3 levels are low The screen positive rate in Down's syndrome screening is correspondingly high; about double the rate in non-IVF pregnancies. (Wald NJ, White N, Morris JK, Huttly WJ, Canick JA (1999) Serum markers for Down's syndrome in women who have had in vitro fertilization: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106, 1304-1306)

In IVF pregnancies, hCG and uE3 levels should be adjusted to avoid the high screen positive rate.

Inhibin-A Adding  inhibin-A as a fourth marker to the standard triple test increases the detection rate from 69% to 76% for a false-positive rate of 5%. (Wald NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1996) Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome using Inhibin-A as a serum marker. Prenat Diagn 16, 143-153)

The inhibin-A based quadruple test has been shown to be the most effective  second trimester screening test for Down's syndrome suitable for routine use.

If you are involved in screening in the United States, and are interested in using inhibin-A in your screening programme, you can get more information from Jack Canick (jcanick@smtp.wihri.org) or Lenny Kellner (afpplus3@aol.com)

14 weeks The markers used in screening for Down's syndrome between 15 and 22 weeks have now been shown to be effective at 14 weeks. (Wald NJ, Watt HC, Haddow JE, Knight GJ. (1998) Screening for Down syndrome at 14 weeks of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 18, 291-293)

It is reasonable to offer Down's syndrome screening using these markers from 14 weeks, although the serum AFP measurement for NTD screening is less effective at this time than between 16 and 18 weeks.

Validating risk estimates using alpha Outcome

How do you know that the risk estimates generated by Down's syndrome screening software are accurate? The ability to demonstrate that risk estimates are correct would be a complete validation of the screening methodology.

alpha has been validated in this way, and only alpha (in conjunction with alpha Outcome) enables users to perform this validation analysis for themselves.

For more information on validating screening using alpha Outcome click here.

Courses and meetings

STUDY DAYS
FOR MIDWIVES
Screening for Down's syndrome

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK

A one day course, primarily aimed at midwives, nurses and health visitors involved in Down's syndrome screening, as well as antenatal screening coordinators and counsellors.

The course provides theoretical and practical knowledge on all aspects of first and second trimester screening for Down's syndrome, with emphasis on education and patient counselling. Topics include:

  • Medical and genetic characteristics of Down's syndrome
  • Principles of serum and nuchal translucency screening
  • Laboratory considerations
  • Information for patients
  • Reporting and explaining screening results and counselling

For further details, please contact the course organiser, Cecily Cromby

Email: Cecily Cromby
Phone: +44 (0)20 7882 6258

Website: http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/epm/screening/midwife.html

COURSE Intensive course on screening for Down's syndrome

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK

9th - 11th May 2011

This is the fifteenth annual course to be held at the Wolfson Institute. Lasting three days, it is an intensive theoretical and practical course in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Topics covered include:-

  • Principles of screening - understanding MoMs, false positive rate, detection rate, and risk
  • The integrated test
  • How to measure nuchal translucency
  • Screening performance of nuchal translucency
  • Nasal bone as an ultrasound marker
  • Advances in first and second trimester screening
  • Screening performance using different combinations of markers
  • Results from the SURUSS study, the FASTER study and the IRS project 
  • Computer Workshop on monitoring and quality control
  • Workshop on patient information and counselling

For further details, please contact the course organiser:

Email: Cecily Cromby
Phone: +44 (0)20 7882 6258

Website: http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/epm/screening/intensive.html

Serum, urine and ultrasound screening study (SURUSS)

The report of a large collaborative study designed to identify the most effective, safe and cost-effective method of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome, using nuchal translucency, first and second trimester serum and urine markers, and age, in various combinations. Results were based on about 47,000 pregnancies, including 101 pregnancies with Down' syndrome.

The full report, executive summary and editorial are available on the Journal of Medical Screening website free of charge. Click on the PDF to download the section required in PDF format.

You can also obtain the full report and the executive summary from the website of the NCCHTA (National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment). Click on Browse a list of all published HTA reports, select Search Publications, enter SURUSS in the search box, and Press Go. Click on the title of the report for details.

The Medical Screening Society

An international society set up in November 2002 to provide a forum for those interested in medical screening to discuss ideas and problems, and to share their experiences. The Journal of Medical Screening is the journal of the Society.

If you are interested in joining the Society, please visit their website

alpha achieves European and Canadian Quality Assurance Approval

In December 2003, Logical Medical Systems was awarded a Certificate of Approval by Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance, confirming its compliance with the quality management system standards in ISO 9001:2000, ISO 13485:2003 and ISO 13485:1996.

alpha now carries a CE mark, in accordance with the requirements of the European Directive on in-vitro medical devices (Directive 98/79/EC) and the UK Medical Device Regulations 2002:618.

Logical Medical Systems has also been approved for the development, distribution, installation, support and maintenance of software for antenatal risk evaluation under the relevant requirements of the Canadian Medical Devices Regulations.

Antenatal and Neonatal Screening - second edition

Edited by Nicholas Wald and Ian Leck

An up-to-date text on antenatal and neonatal screening, including chapters on screening for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome, and on the principles of screening using single-marker and multiple-marker tests.

For more details, or to order a copy, visit the OUP website

ISBN: 0-19-262826-7

Oxford University Press, November 2000

Oxford University Press
Tel: +44 (0)1536 454534

Selected references

The following publications may be of interest. The references identify certain topics, such as the integrated test, the use of inhibin-A, validation of risk estimates, and detection of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. If you would like any further information, please let us know.

1 Wald NJ, Huttly WJ, Hackshaw AK (2003)
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome with the quadruple test. Lancet 361, 835-836

 

2 Wald NJ, Rish S, Hackshaw AK (2003)
Combining nuchal translucency and serum markers in prenatal screening for Down syndrome in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 23, 588-592

 

3 Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK et al (2003)
First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS). J Med Screen 10, 56-104

 

4

Rudnicka AR, Wald NJ, Huttly W, Hackshaw AK. (2002).
Influence of maternal smoking on the birth prevalence of Down syndrome and on second trimester screening performance. Prenat Diagn 22, 893-897

 

5 Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, George LM. (2000)
Assay precision of serum alpha-fetoprotein in antenatal screening for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome
. J Med Screen 7,74-77

 

6 Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ et al. (1999)
Levels of unconjugated estriol and other maternal serum markers in pregnancies with Smith-Lemli-Optiz (RSH) syndrome fetuses. Am J Med Genet 82, 355-358

 

7 Wald NJ, Huttly WJ. (1999)
Validation of risk estimation using the quadruple test in prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 19, 1083-1084

 

8 Wald NJ, Watt HC, Hackshaw AK (1999)
Integrated screening for Down's syndrome based on tests performed during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med 341, 461-467

 

9 Wald NJ, White N, Morris JK, Huttly WJ, Canick JA (1999)
Serum markers for Down's syndrome in women who have had in vitro fertilization: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106, 1304-1306

 

10 Canick JA, Rish S. (1998)
The accuracy of assigned risks in maternal serum screening. Prenat Diagn 18, 413-415

 

11 Irons MB, Tint GS. (1998)
Prenatal diagnosis of Smith-Lemli-Optiz syndrome. Prenat Diagn 18, 369-372

 

12 Noble J. (1998)
Natural history of Down's syndrome: a brief review for those involved in antenatal screening. J Med Screen 5, 172-177

 

13 Onda T, Tanaka T, Takeda O, Kitigawa M, Kuwabara Y, Yamamoto H, Jinuma K, Shimomura K. (1998)
Agreement between predicted risk and prevalence of Down syndrome in second-trimester triple-marker screening in Japan. Prenat Diagn 18, 956-958

 

14 Schuchter K, Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, Hafner E, Liebhardt E. (1998)
The distribution of nuchal translucency at 10-13 weeks of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 18, 281-286

 

15 Wald NJ, Watt HC, Haddow JE, Knight GJ. (1998)
Screening for Down syndrome at 14 weeks of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 18, 291-293

 

16 Wald NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1997)
Inhibin-A in Down's syndrome pregnancies: revised estimate of standard deviation. Prenat Diagn 17, 285-290

 

17 Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK. (1997)
Combining ultrasound and biochemistry in first-trimester screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 17, 821-829

 

18 Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, Huttly W, Kennard A. (1997)
Empirical validation of risk screening for Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 3, 185-187

 

19 Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. (1997).
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 4, 181-246

 

20 Aitken DA, Wallace EM, Crossley JA, et al. (1996)
Dimeric inhibin-A as a marker for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy. N Engl J Med 334, 1231-1236

 

21 Cuckle HS, Holding S, Jones R, Groome NP, Wallace EM. (1996)
Combining inhibin A with existing second trimester markers in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 16, 1095-1100

 

22 Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA, Palomaki GE, Schneyer AL. (1996)
Second trimester levels of maternal serum inhibin-A, total inhibin, a inhibin precursor and activin in Down's syndrome pregnancies. J Med Screen 3, 58-62

 

23 Spencer K, Wallace EM, Ritoe S. (1996)
Second trimester dimeric inhibin-A in Down's syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn 16, 1101-1110

 

24 Wald NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1996)
Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome using Inhibin-A as a serum marker. Prenat Diagn 16, 143-153

 

25 Wald NJ, George L, Smith D, Densem J, Petterson K (1996)
Serum screening for Down's syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103, 407-412

 

26 Wallace E, Swanston I, Grant V, et al. (1996)
Second trimester screening for Down's syndrome using serum dimeric inhibin-A. Clin Endocrinol 44, 17-21

 

27 Watt HC, Wald NJ, Smith D, Kennard A, Densem J (1996)
Effect of allowing for ethnic group in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 16, 691-698

 

28 Pandya PP, Snijders RJM, Johnson SP, de Loudes Brizot M, Nicolaides KH. (1995)
Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102, 957-962

 

©Logical Medical Systems 2006