|
First trimester screening - the 'combined' test
Combining the ultrasound marker
nuchal translucency with biochemical markers has been shown to be an
effective method of screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester of
pregnancy (10-13 weeks) with an expected detection rate of 85% at a
false-positive rate of 5%. (Wald
NJ, Hackshaw AK. (1997) Combining ultrasound and biochemistry in first-trimester screening for
Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 17, 821-829)
With
alpha,
you can interpret first trimester screening results as well as second
trimester, using one software. You can also use
alpha
to interpret the integrated test, in which first and second trimester


Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS)
alpha
version 7.0 can identify pregnancies at high risk of
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) among women who screen positive for
Down's syndrome or Edward's syndrome (trisomy 18). An additional
diagnostic test (measurement of 7-DHC in amniotic
fluid) can then be offered to these women. This approach can detect 50-60%
of SLOS pregnancies, without increasing the number of diagnostic tests
performed.

Advances in second trimester screening
|
In vitro fertilization
|
Second trimester
total hCG and free beta hCG levels are raised in women who have become
pregnant through in vitro fertilization(IVF) and
uE3 levels are low The screen positive rate in Down's syndrome
screening is correspondingly high; about double the rate in non-IVF
pregnancies.
(Wald
NJ, White N, Morris JK, Huttly WJ, Canick JA (1999) Serum markers for Down's syndrome in women who have had
in vitro
fertilization: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol 106, 1304-1306).
In IVF pregnancies, hCG and uE3
levels should be adjusted to avoid the high screen positive rate. |
|
Inhibin-A |
Adding
inhibin-A as a fourth marker to the standard triple
test increases the detection rate from 69% to 76% for a false-positive
rate of 5%. (Wald
NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1996) Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome using
Inhibin-A as a serum
marker. Prenat Diagn 16, 143-153)
The inhibin-A based quadruple
test has been shown to be the most effective second trimester
screening test for Down's syndrome suitable for routine use.
If you are involved in
screening in the United States, and are interested in using inhibin-A in
your screening programme, you can get more information from Jack Canick
(jcanick@smtp.wihri.org) or
Lenny Kellner (afpplus3@aol.com) |
|
14 weeks |
The markers used
in screening for Down's syndrome between 15 and 22 weeks have now been
shown to be effective at 14 weeks. (Wald
NJ, Watt HC, Haddow JE, Knight GJ. (1998) Screening for Down syndrome at 14 weeks of pregnancy.
Prenat Diagn
18, 291-293)
It is reasonable to offer
Down's syndrome screening using these markers from 14 weeks, although
the serum AFP measurement for NTD screening is less effective at this
time than between 16 and 18 weeks. |

Validating risk estimates using alpha Outcome
How do you know that the risk
estimates generated by Down's syndrome screening software are accurate? The
ability to demonstrate that risk estimates are correct would be a complete
validation of the screening methodology.
alpha
has been validated in this way, and only
alpha
(in conjunction with
alpha Outcome)
enables users to perform this validation analysis for themselves.
For more information on validating
screening using
alpha Outcome
click here.

Courses and meetings
STUDY DAYS
FOR MIDWIVES |
Screening for
Down's syndrome
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry,
London, UK
A one day course, primarily
aimed at midwives, nurses and health visitors involved in Down's
syndrome screening, as well as antenatal screening coordinators and
counsellors.
The course provides theoretical
and practical knowledge on all aspects of first and second trimester
screening for Down's syndrome, with emphasis on education and patient
counselling. Topics include:
- Medical and genetic characteristics of Down's syndrome
- Principles of serum and nuchal translucency screening
- Laboratory considerations
- Information for patients
- Reporting and explaining screening results and counselling
For further details, please contact the course organiser, Cecily
Cromby
Email: Cecily
Cromby
Phone: +44 (0)20 7882 6258
Website: http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/epm/screening/midwife.html |
|
COURSE |
Intensive
course on screening for Down's syndrome
Wolfson Institute of Preventive
Medicine
St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry,
London, UK
9th - 11th May 2011
This is the fifteenth annual
course to be held at the Wolfson Institute. Lasting three days, it is an intensive theoretical and practical course in antenatal
screening for Down's syndrome.
Topics covered include:-
- Principles of screening -
understanding MoMs, false positive rate, detection rate, and risk
- The integrated test
- How to measure nuchal
translucency
- Screening performance of
nuchal translucency
- Nasal bone as an ultrasound
marker
- Advances in first and second
trimester screening
- Screening performance using
different combinations of markers
- Results from the SURUSS
study, the FASTER study and the IRS project
- Computer Workshop on
monitoring and quality control
- Workshop on patient
information and counselling
For further details, please
contact the course organiser:
Email:
Cecily Cromby
Phone: +44 (0)20 7882 6258
Website:
http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/epm/screening/intensive.html |

Serum, urine and ultrasound screening study (SURUSS)
The report of a large collaborative
study designed to identify the most effective, safe and cost-effective
method of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome, using nuchal
translucency, first and second trimester serum and urine markers, and age,
in various combinations. Results were based on about 47,000 pregnancies,
including 101 pregnancies with Down' syndrome.
The full report, executive summary
and editorial are available on the Journal
of Medical Screening website free of charge. Click on the PDF to
download the section required in PDF format.
You can also obtain the full report
and the executive summary from the website of the NCCHTA
(National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment). Click on Browse
a list of all published HTA reports, select Search Publications, enter
SURUSS in the search box, and Press Go. Click on the title of
the report for details.

The Medical Screening Society
An international society set up in
November 2002 to provide a forum for those interested in medical screening
to discuss ideas and problems, and to share their experiences. The
Journal of Medical
Screening is the journal of the Society.
If you are interested in joining
the Society, please
visit their
website

alpha achieves European and Canadian Quality Assurance
Approval
In December 2003, Logical Medical Systems was awarded a Certificate of
Approval by Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance, confirming its compliance
with the quality management system standards in ISO 9001:2000, ISO
13485:2003 and ISO 13485:1996.
alpha now carries a CE mark, in
accordance with the requirements of the European Directive on in-vitro
medical devices (Directive 98/79/EC) and the UK Medical Device
Regulations 2002:618.
Logical Medical Systems has also
been approved for the development, distribution, installation, support and
maintenance of software for antenatal risk evaluation under the relevant
requirements of the Canadian Medical Devices Regulations.

Antenatal and Neonatal Screening - second edition
Edited by Nicholas Wald and Ian Leck
An up-to-date text on antenatal and neonatal screening, including chapters
on screening for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome, and on the
principles of screening using single-marker and multiple-marker tests.
For more details, or to order a
copy, visit the
OUP
website
ISBN: 0-19-262826-7
Oxford University Press, November
2000
Oxford University Press
Tel: +44 (0)1536 454534

Selected references
The following publications may be
of interest. The references identify certain topics, such as the integrated
test, the use of inhibin-A, validation of risk estimates, and detection of
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. If you would like any further information,
please let us know.
|
1 |
Wald
NJ, Huttly WJ, Hackshaw AK (2003)
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome with the quadruple test.
Lancet 361, 835-836
|
| 2 |
Wald
NJ, Rish S, Hackshaw AK (2003)
Combining nuchal translucency and serum markers in prenatal screening
for Down syndrome in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 23, 588-592
|
|
3 |
Wald
NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK et al (2003)
First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the
results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS).
J Med Screen 10, 56-104
|
| 4 |
Rudnicka
AR, Wald NJ, Huttly W, Hackshaw AK.
(2002).
Influence of maternal smoking on the birth prevalence of Down syndrome
and on second trimester screening performance. Prenat Diagn 22,
893-897
|
|
5 |
Wald
NJ, Hackshaw AK, George LM. (2000)
Assay precision of serum alpha-fetoprotein in antenatal screening for
neural tube defects and Down's syndrome.
J Med Screen 7,74-77
|
|
6 |
Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ et al. (1999)
Levels of unconjugated estriol and other maternal serum markers in
pregnancies with Smith-Lemli-Optiz (RSH) syndrome fetuses. Am J Med
Genet 82, 355-358
|
| 7 |
Wald
NJ, Huttly WJ. (1999)
Validation of risk estimation using the quadruple test in prenatal
screening for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 19, 1083-1084
|
|
8 |
Wald
NJ, Watt HC, Hackshaw AK (1999)
Integrated screening for Down's syndrome based on tests performed
during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med 341,
461-467
|
|
9 |
Wald
NJ, White N, Morris JK, Huttly WJ, Canick JA (1999)
Serum markers for Down's syndrome in women who have had in vitro
fertilization: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol 106, 1304-1306
|
| 10 |
Canick JA, Rish S. (1998)
The accuracy of assigned risks in maternal serum screening. Prenat
Diagn 18, 413-415
|
|
11 |
Irons MB, Tint GS. (1998)
Prenatal diagnosis of Smith-Lemli-Optiz syndrome. Prenat Diagn
18, 369-372
|
| 12 |
Noble J. (1998)
Natural history of Down's syndrome: a brief review for those involved in
antenatal screening. J Med Screen 5, 172-177
|
| 13 |
Onda
T, Tanaka T, Takeda O, Kitigawa M, Kuwabara Y, Yamamoto H, Jinuma K,
Shimomura K. (1998)
Agreement between predicted risk and prevalence of Down syndrome in
second-trimester triple-marker screening in Japan. Prenat Diagn
18, 956-958
|
| 14 |
Schuchter K, Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, Hafner E, Liebhardt E. (1998)
The distribution of nuchal translucency at 10-13 weeks of pregnancy.
Prenat Diagn 18, 281-286
|
|
15 |
Wald
NJ, Watt HC, Haddow JE, Knight GJ. (1998)
Screening for Down syndrome at 14 weeks of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn
18, 291-293
|
| 16 |
Wald
NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1997)
Inhibin-A in Down's syndrome pregnancies: revised estimate of standard
deviation. Prenat Diagn 17, 285-290
|
| 17 |
Wald
NJ, Hackshaw AK. (1997)
Combining ultrasound and biochemistry in first-trimester screening for
Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 17, 821-829
|
|
18 |
Wald
NJ, Hackshaw AK, Huttly W, Kennard A. (1997)
Empirical validation of risk screening for Down's syndrome. J Med
Screen 3, 185-187
|
|
19 |
Wald
NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. (1997).
Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 4, 181-246
|
| 20 |
Aitken DA, Wallace EM, Crossley JA, et al. (1996)
Dimeric inhibin-A as a marker for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.
N Engl J Med 334, 1231-1236
|
| 21 |
Cuckle HS, Holding S, Jones R, Groome NP, Wallace EM. (1996)
Combining inhibin A with existing second trimester markers in maternal
serum screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn 16, 1095-1100
|
| 22 |
Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick
JA, Palomaki GE, Schneyer AL. (1996)
Second trimester levels of maternal serum inhibin-A, total inhibin, a
inhibin precursor and activin in Down's syndrome pregnancies. J Med
Screen 3, 58-62
|
| 23 |
Spencer K, Wallace EM, Ritoe S. (1996)
Second trimester dimeric inhibin-A in Down's syndrome screening.
Prenat Diagn 16, 1101-1110
|
|
24 |
Wald
NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S, Knight PG. (1996)
Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome using Inhibin-A as a serum
marker. Prenat Diagn 16, 143-153
|
| 25 |
Wald
NJ, George L, Smith D, Densem J, Petterson K (1996)
Serum screening for Down's syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103, 407-412
|
| 26 |
Wallace E, Swanston I, Grant V, et al. (1996)
Second trimester screening for Down's syndrome using serum dimeric
inhibin-A. Clin Endocrinol 44, 17-21
|
| 27 |
Watt
HC, Wald NJ, Smith D, Kennard A, Densem J (1996)
Effect of allowing for ethnic group in prenatal screening for Down's
syndrome. Prenat Diagn 16, 691-698
|
| 28 |
Pandya PP, Snijders RJM, Johnson SP, de Loudes Brizot M, Nicolaides KH.
(1995)
Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal
translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol 102, 957-962
|

|
©Logical Medical Systems
2006
|
 |
|